Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 141 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 141 Next Page
Page Background

12

-

Transfer Pricing in China 2016

KNOWLEDGE SHARING PLATFORM For further information on transfer pricing, please visit our Knowledge Sharing Platform hosting a wide range of resources fromour experts at Dezan Shira & Associates EXPLORE DETAILS

There are several reasons why countries (irrespective of whether they are an OECD member or not)

have adopted the arm’s length principle. A major reason is that the arm’s length principle provides

broad parity of tax treatment for members of multinational groups and independent enterprises.

Because the arm’s length principle puts associated and independent enterprises on a more equal

footing for tax purposes, it avoids the creation of tax advantages or disadvantages that would

otherwise distort the relative competitive positions of either type of entity. In so removing these

tax considerations from economic decisions, it is believed that the arm’s length principle promotes

the growth of international trade and investment.

When applying the arm’s length principle, a firm may encounter companies within a corporate

group that engage in transactions that independent enterprises would not. An example of such a

transaction is the provision of intercompany loans. A cash-rich group company would be willing

to lend funds to a group company, but such a transaction will not occur between third parties that

are not in the business of borrowing and lending money.

There may be other cases where entities within a group may price their transactions differently

from third parties. Such transactions may not necessarily be motivated by tax avoidance but may

occur because, in routine business transactions with each other, members of a group face different

commercial circumstances than independent enterprises. Where independent enterprises seldom

undertake transactions of the type entered into by associated enterprises, the arm’s length principle

is difficult to apply because there is little or no direct evidence of what conditions would have been

established by independent enterprises. Themere fact that a transactionmay not be found between

independent parties does not in itself mean that it is not arm’s length.

Another key difficulty with the application of the arm’s length principle is the fact that it is a

separate entity approach. Such an approach may not always account for the economies of scale

and interrelation of diverse activities created by integrated businesses. Within the arm’s length

principle, there is currently no widely accepted objective criteria for allocating the economies of

scale or benefits of integration between associated enterprises.