Previous Page  8 / 14 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 14 Next Page
Page Background

8

Due Process in Terminating

an Employee in India

By Dezan Shira & Associates

Editor: Siddhartha Thyagarajan

Employers are exposed to a number of legal

and reputational risks resulting from wrongful

termination, or not following due process.

Employers should, therefore, plan to construct

contracts and human resource (HR) materials to

ensure that senior management, HR personnel

and employees are fully apprised of their rights

and responsibilities.

There is no standard process to terminate an

employee in India. An employeemay be terminated

according to the individual labor contract signed

between the employee and the employer, if

the contract defines a process for termination.

Employers should be aware, however, that labor

laws supersede the provisions of labor contracts

– any termination policy or clause outlined within

a contract should be checked against the law by

a professional.

In the case that there is no labor contract, or

the labor contract does not define a method of

termination, then the employer has to follow

the state law. In this scenario, an employer needs

to abide by India’s distinct, state-specific labor

legislations in order to terminate the employee.

Pre-defined Termination

In most cases, employment contracts are very

specific about the process for terminating

employment. This is mostly the case when

termination is by mutual agreement, and in

particular in caseswhere contractual employment is

set for a fixed period. For instance, consultants with

international organizations, or interns at private

organizations, often have defined employment

periods.

An employee is considered terminated at the

conclusion of such a contract, unless a newcontract

is offered or the clauses in the initial contract are

amended. As in most countries, employees that

are terminated by employers are often given one

month notice or payment of one month of wages

in lieu thereof.

Termination by Law

As previouslymentioned, any termination needs to

comply with federal and state law because these

laws supersede contract provisions. However,

state law becomes particularly important when

no defined procedure for termination exists. In

such scenarios, state law becomes the rule of

thumb for terminating an employee. State law

itself is dependent on the area of operations of

the employer.

In the below section, we examine state laws for

termination in several prominent investment

destinations, including the Delhi Union Territory,

Maharashtra, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.

The Delhi Shops & Establishments Act, 1954

An employer cannot terminate an employee who

has been with the corporation for more than three

months without giving the employee at least 30

days of notice or a salary in lieu of such notice. An

employer need not give notice if misconduct is