Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 12 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 12 Next Page
Page Background

11

China’s New NGO Law and

its Impact on FDI into the

Higher Education Industry

By Dezan Shira & Associates

Editors: Samuel Wrest and Mia Yiqiao Jing

China’s long-anticipated Non-governmental

Organization (NGO) Lawwas released in April 2016.

Widely reported in mainstream Western media

and commented on by foreign governments,

the law, set to come into effect in January 2017,

is widely seen as part of President Xi Jinping’s

efforts to restrict and control organizations whose

interests aren’t in line with those of the Chinese

Communist Party.The lawplaces various constraints

on foreign NGOs in the name of protecting China’s

national security, but the ripples resulting from its

implementationwill not be limited toNGOactivities

as traditionally defined in the West. Indeed, the

broad and at times vague language contained in

the law mean that its provisions can quite easily

be applied to China’s private education industry.

This is most starkly exemplified in the law’s blanket

ban on all “for-profit” foreign schools, the makeup

and activities of which are not clearly defined. Due

to its loose definition of “non-governmental” and

“non-profit”, there is also a risk that the marketing

and funding activities of education providers that

aren’t for-profit will also be affected.

One of the other defining characteristics of the

NGO law is its requirement that foreign NGOs

be reviewed by the Public Security Bureau rather

than the Ministry of Civil Affairs, illustrating how

the Chinese government might view NGOs as

potentially hostile. This will extend to foreign

education providers, with activities such as

registration, licensing, recruitment, operations,

and education programs needing to be disclosed.

Complying with the NGO Law

Asmentioned in the second article of thismagazine,

theNGO law is one of several contradictory pieces of

Chinese legislation concerning for-profit education

activities. Because the law doesn’t clearly indicate

which practices are considered“for profit”, it is likely

that it will be used as ameans for local governments

to shut down foreign education institutions that

they do not approve of. It is therefore essential

that foreign investors regularly communicate with

local governments in order to understand their

area-specific development strategies, targets, and

howeducation programs can boost local economic

development.

Traditionally, foreign universities have targeted

China’s more affluent coastal cities. However,

the Chinese government is now putting more

emphasis on providing high-quality education

services to children in Central and Western China.

With China targeting 20 percent of its energy mix

to be clean before 2030, the government is also

working to promote expertise in atmospheric

science, disaster management, ecology and

environmental engineering.

While the NGO Law stands to further impede FDI

into China’s higher education market, the Sino-

foreign education industry is still expected to

expand overall. In order to ensure that investment

is worthwhile, foreign education providers will have

to look closely at a number of influencing factors,

including the location of their institution or

program and the subjects that it teaches.